What You Don t Know About Future Cancer Research

Cancer Fund raising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure may be obtained. The Council organizes special events like Concert for a Cause and many more to help with ongoing research. The idea is fun and people may have more knowledge on the way to prevent this disease. Fund raising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost.

There are lots of ways that you can help to raise more funds. Car donations are an effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program.

Research Fundraising programs helps the organizations to continue the research process until an advance treatment, prevention and an ultimate cure may be obtained. The Council organizes events like Concert for a Cause and several more. The idea is fun and people can have more knowledge on the way to prevent cancer. Fundraising events raise millions of dollars to sustain the operation and research cost. There are numerous ways that you may help to raise more funds. Car donations are a highly effective and fast way to raise funds. The car donation program offers you a hassle free donation program. Cancer Research Fundraising includes Marathon-For-A-Cause. 80% of the proceeds will go to Cancer Research. Magazines and booklets are also a part of the fundraising program.

As the usage of parachutes is usually limited by purely volunteer activities, as with posting the colors by dropping from the sky onto the sector of an athletic event, you can find far more serious applications that beg to be addressed. For years, brave paratroopers have been mandated to risk their lives by utilizing these unproven devices. One interesting result is that commercial airlines have refused to issue parachutes to their passengers and then for good reason. One aviation expert, speaking on condition of anonymity, has stated flat out that his company will not assume the liability inherent in recommending the usage of such untested devices for passengers.

There is obviously an immediate and urgent need to correct this deficiency in this particular major field of human endeavor. The perception that parachutes are of value is based strictly on anecdotal evidence. It really is a universally accepted axiom that evidence based conclusions, not supported by randomized clinical trials is sorely wanting. It doesn't seem at all unreasonable to proceed immediately to correct this sore deficiency which is so pervasive through the aviation industry.

A highly effective clinical trial that will put this controversy to rest immediately won't seem to be beyond the bounds of reason and practicality. Roughly speaking, it could be executed from a readily available test vehicle for example the old reliable C-130 aircraft. This craft has proven a workhorse the world over and its credentials are impeccable. The whole sequence of events relating to the trial might be carried out in a matter of minutes, seconds in the event the need be. It need only involve a number of test subjects (patients, if need be to keep the terminology continuous), say 100, each of which would wear a parachute and jump out at the signal of the principal investigator (jump master in the vernacular). It should be noted that a certain number of these candidates will be wearing normal parachutes while the specific number, say 5 by way of example, could be wearing what appeared by all accounts to be normal parachutes but would, the truth is, be loaded with ordinary bed sheets. Neither the jumper, the jump master nor the airplane pilot would know which were the dummy packs. For the moment it is not essential to prescribe just what this number will be. This really is better left to a committee of mathematicians from the national cancer treatment Institute to ascertain what number of "paracebos" would give the most conclusive data.

The opportunity for excellence in data reduction is manifold. As an example, beyond the mere morbidity statistics, we could envision varying degrees of injury, as well as predict survival estimates for all those who did not suffer the inconvenience of death at impact with the earth. This might effortlessly provide gainful employment for hundreds of research technicians. Of course there would be necessary and proper expenses. Surely the pilot and co-pilot should be rewarded handsomely for their participation, not forgetting the principal investigator (jump master). Probably the biggest expense of all would be the media blitz to recruit volunteers. It's to be expected that intense pressure must be exerted to raise awareness on the requirement for such testing and ultimately get these brave heroes to volunteer. A solid call to their obligation to fellow air travelers world wide and their role as courageous scientists in a brave new venture should be sufficient. As a note on expenses, it shouldn't be necessary to pay these brave souls anything as their participation in such a noble cause should, itself, be reward enough. After all, they did get a free ride on the airplane with complimentary light refreshments, free use of the parachute, free instruction from the jump master and a unforgettable descent to Mother Earth. What more could a reasonable participant ask? Financial support should be easily forthcoming from the likes of Boeing, Lockheed and the commercial airlines who stand to benefit considerably from the outcome.